H.R. 6666 May Not Be Satanic, But It Is Devilish

Townhall.comEarlier this month – on May Day to be precise – one of the most liberal members of Congress (Illinois Rep. Bobby Rush) introduced a bill that would provide $100 Billion in its first year to jump start the process of “contact tracing” for COVID-19 infected persons. The bill would accomplish this through a proposed army of “mobile health units” and government-authorized visits to “individuals’ residences.” The bill quickly attracted conservative opposition, due in part because the number assigned to it – H.R. 6666 – is similar to “666,” which is the biblical “mark of Satan.” Predictably, left-wing media sources have been quick to ridicule such characterizations as an easy way to undermine substantive opposition to the measure. Make no mistake, however, the bill is a dangerous piece of legislation, not because of its number, but because of its substance.H.R. 6666 may not the work of the Devil, but it is the latest in a long line of legislative vehicles pushed by congressional Democrats (and some Republicans) to increase the federal government’s power to gather and database private information on citizens. This helps to accomplish what always has been the ultimate goal of the modern Democratic Party: control of the populace.In this latest effort, House Democrats have employed the tradecraft for which the Congress has become notoriously adept – hiding the true purpose of legislation behind a façade of protecting people from a known or perceived danger. In this case, the scourge of COVID-19. The avowed purpose of this and similar measures is, of course, not to erode individual privacy, but to “make us safe.” As with the crafting of the massive, privacy-invasive...

When Did ‘Risk’ Become A Four-Letter Word?

Daily Caller Before the decision was made in the summer of 1945 to use the atomic bomb to end the war in the Pacific, the U.S. government planned for a massive invasion of the Japanese islands. Estimates at the time said that up to half a million American lives could be lost. Still, it was a risk our leaders were willing to take in order to decisively end the bloodiest war in recorded history.In 1945, America’s military and civilian leaders were poised to take that gamble not because they were in any respect foolhardy. Rather, they understood that in war, winning comes not to the timid but to those willing to assess and weigh the cost of defeat against the value of victory and act boldly. Today, 75 years later, it seems as if few in our government would be willing to engage in that calculus and act accordingly.“Risk” — when did the term come to be considered a four-letter word; something to be avoided at all costs? During the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, governments at all levels are mandating measures that are supposed to minimize the risk of individuals becoming infected with the coronavirus, even though the overall risk of most people catching the virus and dying from it is extremely low.While certain measures to guard against becoming infected with the virus make sense especially among the elderly and already-infirm population, many border on the absurd.Just days ago, for example, officials at the Veterans Administration decreed that this Memorial Day, Boy Scouts would not be permitted to place flags on graves of fallen veterans at national cemeteries, for fear...

Laura Loomer Races to Represent President Trump in the Congress

Townhall.com  As President Trump himself tweets (again) in support of 26-year-old firebrand Laura Loomer’s solid congressional campaign to unseat the liberal Democrat incumbent in his home district in Florida (FL-21), the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC) is acting as if the race does not exist. Sadly, it is not unusual for the establishment GOP to look the other way when a movement conservative enters the arena, no matter how strong and promising that candidate may be. In fact, this race is definitely winnable. Loomer has assembled a campaign team led by veteran operatives with numerous victories under its belt, and she already has proven herself a fundraising juggernaut.While Loomer may have some rough edges, she is no dummy, and her political backbone is as solid as they come. Loomer made a name for herself as an investigative journalist, building a massive national following of 265,000 supporters on Twitter who rabidly retweeted her work and cheered in support of all that she did. (Twitter then pulled her account and banned her for life, but that is another issue for another day.)Notwithstanding support from the highest Republican office holder in the land and from numerous other key conservatives, and despite the campaign’s momentum and her “Anti-AOC profile,” the NRCC remains totally silent on Laura Loomer.The Republican Party’s top way of promoting new candidates is its “Young Guns” program.  The Party’s congressional leaders pick candidates from districts across the nation who meet “the minimum threshold of campaign organization and show potential to achieve greater status.” The program currently lists 103 candidates, but the face of young, telegenic grassroots icon Loomer is noticeably missing.Loomer’s campaign has...